2013 Boston Marathon Bombings: The Greatest Movie America Ever Made
Conclusive evidence the Boston incident was neither a terrorist attack, nor a false-flag event, but rather the most blatant hoax of American modern times.
Critical thinkers have amassed a compelling body of evidence, both concrete and circumstantial, which shows the Boston Marathon Bombing was not an actual terrorist attack and not an actual government attack, but instead, was a glossy, staged production.
Here, we will zoom in on five concrete facts of truly conclusive evidence. Incontrovertible proof anyone could present in court - and which, frankly, someone should.
Ch.1: IRREFUTABLE EVIDENCE
In this chapter, we cite an 'expert', an 'eyewitness' and Light itself.
Part 1. Window Debris
April 16th's chillingly scored ABC World News Now "Terror at the Boston Marathon" delivers our 'expert', who is played by Former NYPD Bomb Squad Detective, Kevin Barry.
[On a side note, doesn't the female newscaster's country-style Farmer's Tan lend an extra, classy touch? Exactly the sort of thing one expects in such a polished, well-researched piece from mainstream media giant ABC.]
Back in May of 2010, retired Detective Barry also played a supporting role in the similar NY Times Square Car Bomb production where "cheap, yellow alarm clocks" - not down-home pressure-cookers - were associated with the devices.
Barry, Chairman and Spokesman for IABTI, International Association of Bomb Technicians and Investigators, is the darling of mainstream media bomb squad commentators, and an artful BS (or, 'Bomb Squad') expert.
Over the years he has skillfully delivered his lines in previous socio-media ventures, including the FedEx/UPS bomb threat in the autumn of 2010, the infamous Underwear Bomber event of 2009, and, of course, the Aurora, Colorado Batman Shooting last year.
Quite the portfolio. And this time around, the perennial chosen one of the mass media's PTB plays perhaps his greatest role as ABC's Boston Marathon Bombing Expert in the ominous "Terror at the Boston Marathon", which brings us to our first piece of evidence in The Window Debris Scene.
The prop in question is a mass of material situated on the ground directly in front of the Lenscrafters twin picture windows, at what we will term 'Blast Site One' or, BS1.
Let's inventory Mr. Barry's assessment (video):
(2:11 - 2:40) "...on the ground, you'll also see - in front of the two windows, about twenty feet across and two feet from the building line, outward towards the curb - a white substance."
Barry is asked to "talk about it" by one of the newscasters:
"My opinion is that that may be unexploded tertiary explosive, either uranyl nitrate, similar to [what was] used in the '93 bombing of the World Trade Center, or, it may be ammonium nitrate, commercially manufactured explosive."
Interestingly, Uranyl nitrate is bright yellow - a far cry from the apparent white of the substance we see in the ABC video image. They say we're all entitled to make a mistake now and then, though, even bomb experts with 20 years of experience identifying explosive chemicals, right?
Back to the window debris, and a riddle: What would you expect to see, and immediately recognize, at the site of a blown out pair of large picture windows, but is nowhere to be found in the immediate vicinity of BS1? If you answered, "Glass", you are correct.
In the above close-up we see the substance on the ground is an exact match in color and consistency with the substance still in the windows, otherwise known as glass.
And yet, Bomb Squad Guru Kevin Barry has just informed us that it is not the reasonably expected glass we see pictured, but rather, a pile of powdery unexploded chemicals, one of which is a completely different color than what we can plainly see on the ground.
Well, "he's the expert"... but, where is all the glass and metal debris from the shattered windows which should be there? Oh, wait - here it is:
Clearly, a lot of broken glass can be seen, not a lot of blood, but a lot of broken glass - even some very large pieces. All in a completely different arrangement on the ground - mixed with metal window debris and a bit of marathon litter, in this crime scene styled image from the set location of the first blast.
Why do we see two drastically different crime scenes portrayed? Why do we see small, uniform shards of glass being called explosives in one take, and then see obvious large, broken sheets and mixed sizes of glass and debris in take two?
But wait - before you answer - there's more. A third window scene, to be exact, where yet another, different arrangement of debris is featured.
In this selection the plywood sheet has vanished, even though this image was obviously captured before the bomb squad arrived, and we have small, uniform glass grounds, a yellow construction glove, a blue ball cap and, yes, the reflection of several uniformed and vested police offers in the demolished window.
How can this be?
OK people.. We're rolling... Take 1... Take 2... Take 3...
Part 2. The Blue Bag & The Blast Hole
Our second attraction also stars Detective Barry, who uses his sought-after BS (or, "Bomb Squad") skills to analyze a suspicious blue bag, and the illustrious "blast hole".
(1:23 - 1:46) "If you note, you'll also see an object, blue, in the center of the picture. That blue object is sitting in the seat of the explosion.
"It was not there at the time of the explosion - may have been pulled in to that hole by a negative blast wave.
"After the original explosive wave went outward, there's a negative wave that pulls objects back into the scene of the seat of the explosion."
So, "It was not there at the time of the explosion" - At least that might explain why the thing is clean and undamaged.
But, how can we explain the neglected fact that this immaculate blue bag is nowhere to be seen in any of the images taken immediately after the explosion scene? Exactly how long did it take for that 'negative blast wave' to occur?
Look around, it's not there. Search the news and the net - the only place you'll find that blue bag is when the BS Team or the forensics team appear. (Don't forget - the Bomb Squad Team and the forensic team also have different stages, as we just demonstrated in Pt. 1.)
"- may have been pulled in to that hole by a negative blast wave."
Is there a hole? There is a dark area on the ground at the intersection of the twin Lenscrafters windows, and the brick border of the walkway. But, is it actually a hole - especially, a hole which could have sucked in this blue (forensics kit) bag?
In the below shot we see Yellow Cap Guy stepping right where this black hole should be...
Looks like he's OK... doesn't appear to have tripped or fallen.
Here, we see a close-up of the 'Bomb Squad Scene' bag shown during Detective Kevin Barry's analysis, where there was no broken glass, just 'a powdery substance'. Note the definite black mark beneath the bag - supposedly the 'blast hole'.
Below, we see a close-up of the 'Forensic Scene' bag, which is from the 'Large Sheets of Broken Window Glass' image set. Note the obvious lack of any black mark beneath the bag.
Where's the black hole? These images are supposed to be from the exact same place within relatively the same time frame. Yet, they are completely different.
One has large, diverse sheets of broken glass and a bag with no black mark (let alone an actual hole), and the other has small, uniform crushed glass and a bag with a dark black mark.
The only logical explanation for the existence of two different sets of images which have both been captured and qualified by the Media, is that these two different stagings were from two different controlled scenes.
Ready on the set...
Lights..
Camera...
Pt. 3 Why Did the Cowboy Hat Man Cross the Road?
Our next character sketch features our 'eyewitness', the recognizable Cowboy Hat Man.
Here he is in his role as The Hero during his interview by a young Asian lady who happens to resemble one of the casualties, a young Asian lady, who also happens to resemble the young Asian lady helping push the wheelchair.
The first scene takes place just as CBHM finishes describing his rescue of The Victim and displaying a bloodied US Flag.
(2:02 - 2: 09) Interviewer - "You didn't get hurt?" Hero- "No... because I was across the street."
CBHM can be seen (along with a Young Asian Lady) wheeling The Victim past the Boston Marathon finish line 3 minutes, 11 seconds after the first explosion.
This is the double-amputee victim he is supposed to have rushed over to save by immediately applying tourniquets and reassuring him.
Notice the flags are all down and the smoke has cleared by the time The Hero wheels The Victim across the line.
The first flags aren't even down 30 seconds after the blast, but below, we can see him already standing inside the barricade.
Either he got across the street and over the barricade really, really, super-soldier-nija-like quickly... or, he was already there at the scene.
Instead of rushing to save a life - he's messing with his character props, the cowboy hat and The Flag.
(Do you even see the twin-amputation victim in this shot? He's not there. We're only seconds into the the aftermath, the smoke hasn't even cleared yet... Where is the victim?)
In the above image we see his back turned away from where his supposed needy victim would be, in a classic, Time-Life-style 'war-torn' pose - waving the US Flag amidst the clearing smoke of a terrorist attack.
Why is he fiddling with the fence and the flag and his hat instead of attending to a victim who just lost both his legs?
Several flags and fence sections are down now - but what is CBHM doing? Nothing. He is still standing near the fence, paying no attention whatsoever to the location of the man who he supposedly rushed in to save.
(If you notice, CBHM is't the only one standing around in these shots where people were supposed to have been torn into pieces and laying everywhere, bleeding to death from dismemberment.)
Messing with the fencing before the flags come down...
Still messing with the fencing after several flags are down and considerable smoke has cleared...
Wonder when he'll eventually get around to helping that guy we can't find who has no legs?
Well, the flags are down now, the barricade has been removed and CBHM, The Hero, is still not attending to the victim... he's just standing there.
How can you tell he hasn't helped the double-dismemberment victim? Because there isn't even any blood on his hand or shirt. Look at this close-up of the scene...
The guy in light colored shirt is already "helping" The Victim. (Why isn't he a 'hero' too?)
CBHM, on the other hand, is just busying himself by putting on his Red Cross ID lanyard to get ready for the transport scene, since the empty wheelchair can be seen on standby.
Poor light-colored shirt man will never get the credit he deserves... Maybe he was actually a director, since he can be seen here appearing to give instructions to our CBHM character.
(Hey - is that Steven Spielberg just behind light-colored shirt man?)
How could Cowboy Hat Man have done all the things he says he did... cross the street, get through the standing barricade, rush in and immediately start putting tourniquets on the victims severed limbs - and yet still be captured in so many shots doing absolutely nothing except standing around looking clean, country and patriotic - but manage to still be The Hero who wheels The Victim across the finish line - all in 3 minutes?
It would have been impossible for him to have done all of those things and still have clean hands so far into the aftermath, and there's only one explanation for his role as the eyewitness Hero...
Quiet on the set.. In three... two... one.. You're On!
Pt. 4 The Real False-Flag
Hungry for a real false-flag event? Lucky you, all we need to do to find one is go back to our 'eyewitness' hero once more...
(2:24 -2:44)
Male Interviewer - "You were at the finish line?"
Hero - "You know the flags? You ever seen the flags, how they put - ."
Young Asian Lady Interviewer interjects - "Those big flags, yeah."
Hero - "This is the end, right?" [Motions down toward the sidewalk.] "That's the end. So, from the end here, all the way to the next one - it's going to have some kind of flag. All the flags was gone. All gone."
All the flags were gone, he says... and, granted, of all the actors in this production, if any of them know about flags - it's US Flag waving Cowboy Hat Man... and, yet - we just saw multiple images of him standing next to the flags while they were still up!
This is how the flags came down - they were pulled down by production personnel - and CBHM was right there while it was being done.
If you stood before a court judge and told him in defense that you ran over to the site and "All the flags was gone. All gone." - The prosecution would only need show this photo to prove you were telling a lie.
Look at him - he's looking right at the flags being pulled down... they were not 'all gone', not even close.
How can we reconcile the fact that the Eyewitness Hero of the Boston Marathon Bombings was caught in such a blatant lie?
There's really only one explanation which makes sense...
Cue the lights, please... aaaaannnd... Action!
Pt. 5 Shadow-play
This section is my favorite, because it's such a slap in the face insult to the intelligence of every human being over 5 years of age, and everyone who didn't already notice this should just feel silly.
For evidence item #1, we submit the iconic "Cops" image. Take a good look at it... Notice anything 'amiss'?
If we could call Light Itself to the stand, and ask plainly "In which direction do you travel?" Light would answer with what has been proven for eons, "In a straight line."
Light travels in a straight line from the sun. So what's wrong with this iconic image?
Yes, light travels in a straight line from the sun, everywhere in the world - except Boston, where you can have both a 3:00 shadow and a high noon shadow both in the same place at the same time.
It's OK if you want to kick yourself now... but, you should hold off until after our second evidence submission has been made.
Got your kickin' foot ready? Then take a look at a rare Boston photon phenomenon...
It's a shadow. Of nothing.
Kick away.
Like we said in the beginning - 'Incontrovertible proof anyone could present in court - and which, frankly, someone should.'
Ch. 2 CRITICAL THINKERS
There is a mountain of evidence and inconsistencies available to prove the Boston Marathon Bombing was neither a bona fide terrorist attack, nor a government-sponsored bombing event - but that the whole thing was merely a Hollywood-style motion-picture production.
It is the only logical explanation.
And among those who have spent hours in research, hours in re-winding and re-watching, hours working to get the truth out for the truth's sake, there have risen some real heroes of the information age, alongside some real victims of this Great American Hoax.
Pt. 1 Pike Aero
https://www.youtube.com/user/pikeaero?feature=watch
Pt. 2 Peekay 22
https://www.youtube.com/user/peekay22?feature=
Pt. 3 B'Man
http://buelahman.wordpress.com/author/buelahman/
Pt. 4 Supsects' Aunt - "I'm suspicious that this was staged."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XLtYk9sjAWs
Pt. 5 Suspects' Mother - "Maybe blood at bomb scene is fake."
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9pnnP24xack
Ch. 3 CONCLUSION
We have established there is only one conclusion to be drawn from the body of startling evidence presented here, that of mass-marketed fraud.
But, why?
Mainstream Media says it was a terrorist attack. So-called Alternative Media says it was a false-flag attack. Yet, it was neither.
Why are Alternative Media giants like Alex Jones opposing the facts? We have just seen fake expert testimony, perjured eyewitness testimony and shadows that the Photoshop crew can't even get right - Why, then is this still being called a false-flag event by those who claim to see the truth for what it is?
Again, there can be only one logical explanation... To divide the house of truth.
A divided house cannot stand... What better way to divide the house of so-called truth-seekers from the house of legitimate critical thinkers than to present them both with one event which will interject that sharp division?
Think about it... the sloppiness, the bad editing, the mis-matched scenery... a production that looks as cheap as those yellow alarm clocks found in Times Square.
Why was there such a pitiful effort at making this all this staging look unquestionably real?
Because you, Critical Thinkers, would see the flaws right away, and continue to find them. Because you, Critical Thinkers, would call out to your brothers in the marketplace, and beckon them to dissect reality.
And, because you, Critical Thinkers, would not be believed. No, not by the camp of the conservative, patriotic Right, nor by the winsome and swaying camp of supposed truthers.
The only people who will believe you, Critical Thinkers, are the other Critical Thinkers in the world. Now, the PTB have a tighter rein on those who will willingly turn a blind eye to the truth.
Now, Critical Thinkers, you have been divided from the rest of the world, and at such a time as this.
Take heart. Continue sharing the real truth with others, for we know, the Truth is what shall make us free.
In closing, we issue an open call to add your legitimate evidence and thoughtful observations to this story, as we hope to do ourselves, and to support your fellow Critical Thinkers in honest, brotherly love.
"Love your enemies, bless them that curse you, do good to them that hate you, and pray for them which despitefully use you, and persecute you; That ye may be the children of your Father which is in heaven..."
Matthew 5:14,15
Views: 1128
Replies to This Discussion
-
AdminPermalink Reply by Bean on -
Great article by B'Man, about the staging of the actor we call 'nubs'..
http://buelahman.wordpress.com/2013/04/20/are-you-just-a-believer-o...
-
FounderPermalink Reply by Cyprium on -
Great job on the article Bean...ty for the long hours (and i know they were...lol) you put in writing it. :)
-
FounderPermalink Reply by Cyprium on -
An unidentified FBI agent shot and killed a man in Orlando, Fla., early Wednesday after questioning him about his link to one of the Boston Marathon bombing suspects.
"Dave Couvertier, a special agent and spokesman for the FBI's Tampa field office, told Yahoo News the shooting is under investigation. He identified the man as Ibragim Todashev, a 27-year-old Chechen-born Orlando resident and apparent acquaintance of Tamerlan Tsarnaev, one of the brothers suspected of planning and carrying out the terror attack at last month's Boston Marathon.
Law enforcement officials told the Associated Press that Todashev lunged at the FBI agent with a knife.
The shooting occurred just after midnight at an apartment complex in Orlando. The agent, along with two Massachusetts State Police troopers and other law enforcement personnel, were interviewing Todashev "in connection with the Boston Marathon bombing investigation when a violent confrontation was initiated by the individual," Couvertier said. "An FBI post-shooting incident review team has been dispatched from Washington, D.C., and expected to arrive in Orlando within 24 hours."
The agent, Couvertier added, "sustained non-life-threatening injuries."
Khusen Taramov, a friend of Todashev, told local television reporters in Orlando that he and Todashev were interviewed by the FBI for about three hours on Tuesday.
"They were talking to us," Taramov told WESH-TV. "And they said they need him for a little more, for a couple more hours, and I left, and they told me they’re going to bring him back. They never brought him back. ... He felt inside he was going to get shot. I told him, 'Everything is going to be fine, don't worry about it.' He said, 'I have a really bad feeling.'".."
Full Article: http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/lookout/ibragim-todashev-fbi-shooting-b...
-
AdminPermalink Reply by Prodigal Son on -
2 FBI Agents Involved in Dzhokar Tsarnaev's Arrest ' FALL ' Out of Helicopter and Die
"The statement gave few details regarding the deaths of Special Agents Christopher Lorek and Stephen Shaw, other than to say the helicopter encountered unspecified difficulties and the agents fell a “significant distance.”
Last month, the team was involved in the arrest of Dzhokhar Tsarnaev, a suspect in the Boston Marathon bombings. And in February, it rescued a 5-year-old boy held hostage for six days in an underground bunker in Alabama.
“Whenever things go really wrong, the FBI calls in the Hostage Rescue Team. It’s the government’s 911,” Coulson said.
Irvin Wells, a former FBI special agent who retired in 1990 after leading the Norfolk field office for three years, stressed that the Hostage Rescue Team is different from the FBI’s regular SWAT teams.
He noted that agents assigned to a field office’s SWAT team also must perform other jobs inside the bureau, while agents assigned to the Hostage Rescue Team have no other duties."
http://www.knowthelies.com/node/8991
-
AdminPermalink Reply by Prodigal Son on -
"49 Hoaxes People Actually Believed"?
-
AdminPermalink Reply by Bean on -
This makes 50
Prodigal Son said:"49 Hoaxes People Actually Believed"?
-
FounderPermalink Reply by Cyprium on -
Rene Fielding, Queen of EVIL MANIPULATION Boston Hoax:
http://timenolonger.ning.com/video/rene-fielding-queen-of-evil-mani...
-
AdminPermalink Reply by Bean on -
Published on Jan 15, 2015
Former Clinton/Gore political consultant Naomi Wolf explains why we should be skeptical of overly-theatrical current events such as the Boston Marathon bombing. This was filmed at the 2014 Free State Project's Liberty Forum
© 2024 Created by Cyprium.
Powered by
