This Discussion is posted in response to the video added here:

I am making this its own topic in order to put this information in the forefront and in a category easily found.

As interesting as the story itself are the facts behind it. I have been doing searches on the people and topics surrounding the NOAA mermaid research and there is, without a doubt, a pretty successful campaign to obliterate all information of it from the internet.

First, there is the website of the NOAA scientist, Dr. Paul Robertson.

and the website "The real Evidence on Mermaids, From Dr. Paul Robertson,NOAA"

and the website "Mermaids are Real, Real Evidence From Dr. Paul Robertson, NOAA"

You will notice a similar result clicking all those links:

The only information left on the internet concerning the research of this phenomenon is the Animal Planet special itself, a Wikipedia entry calling that program a "mockumentary" ( ) and various bloggers, youtube members or forum posters speaking on the topic. Many of those speaking on it have come to the conclusion that it is "debunked" based mostly on the claim that Dr. Paul Robertson and a marine biologist by the name of Brian McCormick do not exist.

They are hard to find, but they do exist.

Here is an excerpt from a document by the Narragansett Bay National Estuarine Research Reserve, which research is affiliated with NOAA according to the document, and lists Brian McCormick as one individual who contributed to the project.

"The NBNERR Site Profile was made possible
through the help of many individuals. Notable contributors
and the expertise that they provided include...

Sincere thanks also goes to current and former
NBNERR staff members who assisted with materials
presented in this document, but who did not individually
author any of the chapters. These individuals include Robert
Stankelis, Kristen Van Wagner, Jennifer West, Matthew
Rehor, Kimberly Botelho, Brian McCormick, Alan Beck,
and especially Roger Greene...

This publication is sponsored by the NOAA
Estuarine Reserves Division and the State of Rhode Island.
This publication is also sponsored in part by Rhode Island
Sea Grant under NOAA Grant No. NA040AR4170062. The
views expressed herein do not necessarily refl ect the views
of the NBNERR, NOAA, or any of its sub-agencies. The
U.S. Government is authorized to produce and distribute
reprints for governmental purposes notwithstanding any
copyright notation that may appear hereon."

And here is an excerpt from a document on the minutes of a Devils Lake water improvement district meeting. Listed as staff:

"STAFF: Paul Robertson, Seth Lenaerts, RARE Participant"

and affiliated with NOAA:

"Seid Creek: Green asked what is expected as the outcome on this issue. Robertson said
nothing has occurred. NOAA previously said they were going to do a site inspection in
March. Follow-ups have gone unanswered. Robertson asked if a letter from the Board
would be effective. He explained that this is a construction site that has been filling debris
above wetlands. Last year, a lot of it slid down into the wetlands. DSL has turned away
from any enforcement action and the Corps never investigated. Robertson said it appears
that Seid Creek is a watershed similar to Thompson Creek. Green asked for Robertson to
continue making calls rather than the Board writing a letter just yet."

Why, among all "conspiracy" related topics would this be the one that was so highly attacked? There are certainly elements of well accepted mainstream beliefs that might be shattered with the knowledge of aquatic humanoids. The aquatic ape theory is so poorly presented that even very adamant evolutionists could not help but feel shamed to preach it and it would not suffice to halt the questions about the accepted ideas of how life came to be on Earth. That is not the answer all by itself though. There is something else that should not be lost on the viewer amidst the more sensational news of mermaids. The weaponized "sonar" which the Navy had allegedly invented is surely a serious issue if it were publicly recognized.

I am not sure that i believe this weapon is Naval or is an advanced sonar weapon. We know there are sound weapons now and we know they can be lethal. They are not just a threat to wildlife in the Oceans, they are a threat to people on land as they have the capacity to be used not just in an aquatic environment but anywhere.

The USC sections sited on the shut down sites are those pertaining to making fraudulent or fictitious claims against the government. Those so-called fictitious claims almost certainly relate to the sound weapon mentioned. They are working hard to hide this and i wonder what we can do to make it less hidden, YHWH willing.
UPDATE: May-31-2012
What is the goal of the Discovery channel?

The initial release of Mermaids, The Body Found seemed out of place in the mainstream. We do not usually expect such sources to put forth honest information on anything which involves government secrecy. There was obviously dishonesty put forth in the form the ridiculous aquatic ape theory and the program itself was dubbed a "mockumentary" by Wikipedia.

What is Animal Planet mocking? Perhaps the wish that many have to see someone in the forefront be genuinely interested in disclosing some things that we have known or suspected all along. Or perhaps the mockery of real people who have investigated these things and been subsequently silenced and discredited by the establishment.

Regarding anything which is put under the label "conspiracy theory", the media and entertainment industry has done its job in supplying the skeptics with ammunition against objective consideration of these things. "you watch too much television" is an effective termination to a conversation about UFO's, Montauk, MKULTRA or any one of a number of other topics.

The sites which supposedly supplied information on the topic of mermaids and the sound weapons researched by the scientists are apparently owned by Discovery Channel, themselves. why might they go this far? The easy answer might be greed and that they conducted what amounts to a "marketing ploy". Incongruous to that idea is the fact that we do continue to hear reports of marine mammals dying in the same way described in the program. We can find marine scientists with the names supplied in it and we are already aware of the technological potential of the US military for weapons which exceed anything called science fiction.

The sensational nature of the existence of mermaids attracted the most attention, though from my perspective it was never the most intriguing point. I was not in doubt of the existence of aquatic transgenics before Animal Planet and so what became more interesting to me was what weaponry would be so beyond the belief or acceptance of the public that there would be such a strategic effort to conceal it.

The question that remains for me is; what grain of truth might the establishment have attempted to bury within a massively hyped web of distraction which will remain in the memories of countless people as a marketing hoax? If you are already aware that the powers that be regularly play this game, you will be watching for the little loose threads of truth to follow in the future.

Views: 73836

Reply to This

Replies to This Discussion

Yes all those  suffering and dead mammals on the beaches could bring a lot of people to a place of fighting back.  It was just mammals , right?  Not any other fish effected.  How did that happen?  The frequency perhaps, but it doesn't quite make sense to me that frequency would effect different species, rather than just flesh. I agree that has to be the reason for the scrub and it may be the reason for the whole addition of the aquatic ape added into the mix. It being on the history channel, which in my opinion is being used to condition us for all kinds of future events, isn't that much a surprise since lately they are all about spirits, ufos and the like.  But they could have added the fully laughable material to the whole in order to discredit it in the minds of those who are not nearly as aware of hidden events That is until they  have a reason and plan in place to use it to their advantage.

I've conversed with others about this recently, and predictably, have gotten shot down despite showing the peculiar reality of direct info on the research on the web being seized by Homeland Security. No matter the mounting evidence for any unpopular truth, anything that might shatter the proud, humanistic worldview of one will trigger that same familiar emotive-defensive mechanism. No matter the "progressive logic" it may pretend to stand for, is really is likened to a child holding their ears and shouting "la la la I can't hear you!"


Living mermaids are in a peculiar position. In one perceived advantage, they're more "off the grid" than the vast majority of mainstream humanity. However, as ProdigalSon (author of this article) himself astutely pointed out to me in conversation recently regarding the topic, they are a people perhaps far less likely to hear His Message. And His Command to share the Message to every creature certainly includes these aquatic-folk.

Of course the government says its natural, not the reasons given in the above article.  Its disheartening to me that the birds are now effected, not only mammals as was seen in earlier deaths of this type.  New equipment I guess.

The damage is basically identical to that which is described in the documentary...very interesting. As i'm sure you noticed, this topic is creating somewhat of a stir for this site. We'll see where that goes... O.o head was just about to explode when i read your comment Tristran... "60 new users in the room!? Oh ****" ....but then i remembered that with the new chat room format when you look at the number in the corner of the "main room" chat screen, you're seeing the number of lines typed in the room...not the number of people in the room. Lol...that realization was a relief...ty for the heads up though.

Prodigal I pray your work will stand and be protected.

It is extreamly funny how much they try and push the boundries of "evilution"!
Aquatic apes???
sooo..... we came from a mono-organisim, to a fish to land based fish, to apes then turned back into fish, kinda? Half way? only some of us? Too funny really!
Now im not trying to say mermaids arnt real, they very well could be.
They could also be part of the Nephilim.
possably along with bigfoot, the abonable snow man (both giants too no?)
and theres the possable other mythological creatures too:
Vampires, Werewolfs, faries(i think that story was proven to be made up) etc etc.
After MY discovery of the Nephilim, i am in awe over what could be or could have been real as far as mythological creatures.
Funny thing is, in todays day, it wouldnt suprise me if all were, or at some point were real.

I agree, David. The aquatic ape theory might be the worst attempt at evolution propaganda i have ever seen. Most children could probably point out the holes in this theory but i believe it was perhaps a required distraction in the documentary in order to air it on mainstream media. It does just that, it distracts the viewer from the two points that actually hold possible merit. Most importantly for "them", it distracts from the fact that there is some manner of weapon which is a threat to man, not just animals, and the government has an interest in keeping it quiet.

I do think the evidence is there in scripture and in 1 Enoch to give us the answer to what "mermaids" really are. As you mentioned, hybrid creations of fallen angles. perhaps not nephilim precisely, as those were entirely humanoid in form, but the fallen Watchers also created man/ animal hybrids as well.

maybe the matter of weapon, is actually the sonar in which they use, 2 reasons:
1. its besn stated even radio waves can cause a disturbance to the human (mammal) structure. what if these same waves cause this in sea life?
2. sonar is said to almost mimic mammal sea life speach.
If the sonar can mimic the speach it may be sending a sort of "dialog" to the other mammals to head in certain directions. Or heven prevent actual mammal "dialog" from being heard to "head the right direction".

The weapon described did a certain kind of damage internally to the animals though. Their cells ruptured so I would imagine that this is more like something using powerful low frequency waves and I would also guess that it stems from the same sort of technology used in sonic mind control operations.

David A. Peck said:

maybe the matter of weapon, is actually the sonar in which they use, 2 reasons:
1. its besn stated even radio waves can cause a disturbance to the human (mammal) structure. what if these same waves cause this in sea life?
2. sonar is said to almost mimic mammal sea life speach.
If the sonar can mimic the speach it may be sending a sort of "dialog" to the other mammals to head in certain directions. Or heven prevent actual mammal "dialog" from being heard to "head the right direction".

Also , the Peru incident included birds, Pelicans to be exact.  I wonder how they adjusted to include the birds and specifically pelicans.  Could they be adjusting the frequency so that they can take out certain types? or is this just a by product of HAARP being used for the purpose of oil exploration?  Questions we will not have answered this side of the end of time.

Reply to Discussion


© 2021   Created by Cyprium.   Powered by

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service