Technocracy - Time No Longer2024-03-28T12:58:45Zhttps://timenolonger.ning.com/forum/categories/technocracy-1/listForCategory?categoryId=5124148%3ACategory%3A541&feed=yes&xn_auth=noTechnocratic Cagetag:timenolonger.ning.com,2013-01-29:5124148:Topic:290712013-01-29T21:48:23.594ZCypriumhttps://timenolonger.ning.com/profile/Cyprium
<p>As "progress"...progresses...people will increasingly find themselves trapped inside of a cage without literal bars. It pushes society's limits by increments to accept the unacceptable, all as the price paid for living in "society". Rights? What rights?</p>
<p>----------<br></br><br></br><strong>"Check Out the New Gun That Allows Cops to Shoot and Capture Your DNA</strong><br></br><br></br><strong>"A new tool that would allow law enforcement to prevent criminals from running away or disappearing into a…</strong></p>
<p>As "progress"...progresses...people will increasingly find themselves trapped inside of a cage without literal bars. It pushes society's limits by increments to accept the unacceptable, all as the price paid for living in "society". Rights? What rights?</p>
<p>----------<br/><br/><strong>"Check Out the New Gun That Allows Cops to Shoot and Capture Your DNA</strong><br/><br/><strong>"A new tool that would allow law enforcement to prevent criminals from running away or disappearing into a crowd before arrest was highlighted last week at The SHOT Show in Las Vegas.</strong><br/><br/><strong>The High Velocity DNA Tagging system by the U.K.-based security company Selectamark was introduced with police officers in a riot situation in mind. Coming in both pistol and rifle form, the tool would allow police to remain 30 to 40 meters from the target and tag them with a SelectaDNA High Velocity pellet that contains a unique DNA code to ensure the correct person is apprehended later..."</strong><br/><br/><a href="http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/25/check-out-the-new-gun-that-allows-cops-to-shoot-and-capture-your-dna/">http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2013/01/25/check-out-the-new-gun-that-allows-cops-to-shoot-and-capture-your-dna/</a><br/><br/></p> What Google Earth and Earth Explorer Hidetag:timenolonger.ning.com,2012-06-12:5124148:Topic:209452012-06-12T21:06:26.212ZProdigal Sonhttps://timenolonger.ning.com/profile/ProdigalSon
<p>It is interesting to see what is not to be seen on the satellite imagery of Google Earth and Earth Explorer. I have mostly used Earth Explorer to look at these anomalies because I avoid using Google for anything. I do not assume most or any of it varies much between the two, but if anyone has noticed something different, I welcome the input.</p>
<p>Here are some notable places that have been censored in one way or another:<br></br> <br></br> Temple Mount, Jerusalem (Har HaMoriyah) <br></br> Issue: Low…</p>
<p>It is interesting to see what is not to be seen on the satellite imagery of Google Earth and Earth Explorer. I have mostly used Earth Explorer to look at these anomalies because I avoid using Google for anything. I do not assume most or any of it varies much between the two, but if anyone has noticed something different, I welcome the input.</p>
<p>Here are some notable places that have been censored in one way or another:<br/> <br/> Temple Mount, Jerusalem (Har HaMoriyah) <br/> Issue: Low resolution at close view, no imagery when fully zoomed in</p>
<p><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038477187?profile=original"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038477187?profile=original" width="400"/></a></p>
<p><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038477489?profile=original"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038477489?profile=original" width="400"/></a></p>
<p>Mount Ararat (site of Noah's Ark wreckage) Iqdir Province, Turkey<br/> Issue: One lone cloud obscuring the mountain only in the whole region. Upon closer view much of the "cloud" appears to be Photoshopped effects.<br/></p>
<p><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038479483?profile=original"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038479483?profile=original" width="400"/></a></p>
<p><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038479556?profile=original"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038479556?profile=original" width="400"/></a><br class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038479556?profile=original"/><br/> HAARP facility, Gakona,AK <br/> Issue: Half of main antenna array and lands north of it blurred.</p>
<p></p>
<p><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038487582?profile=original"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038487582?profile=original" width="400"/></a></p>
<p><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3807316688?profile=original"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3807316688?profile=original" width="400"/></a></p>
<p>There are many more interesting omissions and anomalies on these satellite imagery programs but the most interesting to me is the water.<br/> <br/> All bodies of water, except small lakes are obscured with a mask. When looking at the world from the zoomed out perspective, it has been made to appear that you are actually seeing the topography at the bottom of the Ocean. It probably strikes most views as completely normal because we are used to looking at pictures of the earth and globes which show these topographical features.</p>
<p><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038499938?profile=original"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038499938?profile=original" width="600"/></a><strong>North Atlantic false topography^</strong></p>
<p>You would not really be able to see any of those features lying deep in the Ocean floors by looking at a satellite image of the surface. Only the features on the bottom of very shallow water would be visible, certainly never in the midst of the Ocean.<br/></p>
<p>You can check the presence of the mask they have put over Oceans, seas and large lakes by zooming in close next to a coastal area. Very close in next to the land, the real water is visible. It is darker, sometimes greenish and in tropical, shallow areas, a brilliant blue. As you move away from the shore, the stark, primary blue "paint" of the mask becomes visible.</p>
<p><strong>Top: South Carolina coast, Bottom: Norway coast</strong></p>
<p><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038506640?profile=original"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038506640?profile=original" width="400"/></a><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038506966?profile=original"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038506966?profile=original" width="500"/></a><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038507654?profile=original"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038507654?profile=original" width="600"/></a><strong>Bahamas ^</strong></p>
<p></p>
<p>This topographical blue mask on the water has been poorly applied in many areas around small islands, so that the islands are even partially obliterated by it.</p>
<p><strong>Maldive Islands</strong></p>
<p><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038511949?profile=original"><img class="align-full" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038511949?profile=original" width="516"/></a></p>
<p>It is odd to think that these satellites have been able to capture imagery in the most remote regions, like Antarctica and yet the Great Lakes are painted over with fake blue "water". I have no good answer yet as to why they would bother to do this but it is an interesting point to think on.</p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p> Wiredtag:timenolonger.ning.com,2011-11-28:5124148:Topic:172092011-11-28T23:37:43.044ZCypriumhttps://timenolonger.ning.com/profile/Cyprium
<p>Who's wired into the system? Well, better question might be, who isn't? It's become very normal to have all the gadgets..it always precedes from luxury to necessity. At one time everyone lived a normal life without a cell phone...who does that now? At one time, everyone survived without telephone at all...and without television, computers, gps systems, etc.<br></br> <br></br> There are carefully calculated advantages to having any one of these things. There are draw backs too. Most don't calculate…</p>
<p>Who's wired into the system? Well, better question might be, who isn't? It's become very normal to have all the gadgets..it always precedes from luxury to necessity. At one time everyone lived a normal life without a cell phone...who does that now? At one time, everyone survived without telephone at all...and without television, computers, gps systems, etc.<br/> <br/>
There are carefully calculated advantages to having any one of these things. There are draw backs too. Most don't calculate the cost past their wallet but there is a greater price to pay nonetheless. We all have computers obviously...and those computers have been the means of waking one another up..passing vital information...even setting the stage for a vast educational experience that contradicts the intentions for which the internet was created. (halleluYah).<br/>
<br/>
We know what it costs us in our privacy, i'm sure..we all are aware there is no such thing as private internet activity. Where is a wise place to draw the line in being "connected"? Well, that depends on the price you're willing to pay for convenience, communication and entertainment. As for us....we drew the line at cell phones, gps, television of any kind and still haven't given up the old stand by dial up internet connection (because you know there's a reason the government wants us all on wifi, right?).<br/>
<br/>
It was a price worth paying to share information about those things that are hidden from the public's eye....but weighed in the balances, we are not willing to pay the price of brain tumors for communication convenience or being tracked wherever we might go rather than buying one of those outdated atlases.The price of entertainment was too high too...being subject to whatever signals are routinely spread across the digital landscape of television was not worth the pretty pictures on the screen. Wall-mart's great, low prices weren't worth their CIA cameras or their RFID.<br/>
<br/>
"Peer pressure" won't tip the scales...being "normal" won't either. Normal doesn't even enter the range of my radar.As the world makes it harder to live without their luxuries..we simply have to work harder to go around them. Convenience will never pay for itself.<br/>
<br/>
Everyone can make their own decisions about where their own line gets drawn..but everyone should definitely do so with all the information they can get about what prices they will pay for wiring into the system.</p>
<h1>9 Reasons Wired Readers Should Wear Tinfoil Hats: <a href="http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/11/reasons-to-wear-tinfoil-hats/">http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2011/11/reasons-to-wear-tinfoil-hats/</a></h1> This is only a "Test"...tag:timenolonger.ning.com,2011-09-19:5124148:Topic:125082011-09-19T16:56:25.526ZKathyhttps://timenolonger.ning.com/profile/Kathy
<p><strong>Nationwide EAS Test to Last About 3 Minutes</strong></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038480269?profile=original" target="_self"><img class="align-left" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038480269?profile=original" width="375"></img></a></strong></p>
<p>More technical details about the upcoming national EAS test are trickling out of the FCC.</p>
<p>For one thing, the commission is confirming that the test on Nov. 9 will last for about three minutes, something of an eternity in modern-day radio.</p>
<p>The FCC says that during the…</p>
<p><strong>Nationwide EAS Test to Last About 3 Minutes</strong></p>
<p><strong><a target="_self" href="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038480269?profile=original"><img width="375" src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038480269?profile=original" class="align-left"/></a></strong></p>
<p>More technical details about the upcoming national EAS test are trickling out of the FCC.</p>
<p>For one thing, the commission is confirming that the test on Nov. 9 will last for about three minutes, something of an eternity in modern-day radio.</p>
<p>The FCC says that during the test, FEMA will originate a "live" Emergency Action Notification code to all EAS participants, including radio and TV stations, cable systems, Sirius XM, satellite TV providers and wireline video service providers. As part of the test, the public will be told the EAS has been activated for a national emergency, along with an audible notice that "this is a test."</p>
<p>The commission and FEMA, along with stations and cable providers, are working on outreach efforts to inform the public to avoid panic about the test.</p>
<p>There’s also been a lot of debate within engineering circles about how the test will conclude.</p>
<p>The FCC’s Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau says the test will end with transmission of the End of Message code, not the Emergency Action Termination code. The bureau says equipment manufacturers have told the commission that by using the EOM, stations won’t need to reconfigure their EAS encoder/decoders to receive and air the test.</p>
<p>Washington, D.C.’s location code will be the origination code for the EAS test. This, too, has been a question for station engineers, since FEMA previously had said there’s no national EAS location code. The FCC’s Public Safety and Homeland Security Bureau believes most EAS encoder/decoders will automatically forward the EAN with the Washington code and not require further configuration. However the commission recommends that stations that aren’t sure whether their device will forward an EAN with the Washington code to contact their manufacturer or FEMA’s Integrated Public Alert and Warning System Office via email to <a href="mailto:IPAWS@dhs.gov"><u><font color="#0000FF">IPAWS@dhs.gov</font></u></a>.</p>
<p>The commission itself doesn’t plan to conduct pre-tests before the nationwide test; however it says FEMA is working with some states, EAS participants and equipment manufacturers to conduct statewide tests of EAS equipment and procedures before the nationwide event.</p>
<p>Stations can find their state’s EAS contact by referring to their state’s EAS <a href="http://transition.fcc.gov/pshs/services/eas/chairs.html"><u><font color="#0000FF">plan</font></u></a>.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/pshs/"><u><font color="#0000FF">bureau</font></u></a> intends to provide more information before the test.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.radioworld.com/article/nationwide-eas-test-to-last-about--minutes/24188">http://www.radioworld.com/article/nationwide-eas-test-to-last-about--minutes/24188</a></p>
<p> </p> Airport Body Scanners: Basic Decency Deniedtag:timenolonger.ning.com,2010-11-20:5124148:Topic:37052010-11-20T22:07:59.000ZCypriumhttps://timenolonger.ning.com/profile/Cyprium
On December 25th of last year came a curious holiday gift wrapped in a Nigerian man's undergarments and delivered aboard Northwest Airlines. Who can forget the so-called "Underwear Bomber"? A bizarre incident which really evokes a deep down sense of absurdity...but treated with such seriousness by the government and media and finally by a public who is again admonished to keep remembering and believing in the imminent threat of Islamic terrorism.<br />
<br />
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was supposedly on a…
On December 25th of last year came a curious holiday gift wrapped in a Nigerian man's undergarments and delivered aboard Northwest Airlines. Who can forget the so-called "Underwear Bomber"? A bizarre incident which really evokes a deep down sense of absurdity...but treated with such seriousness by the government and media and finally by a public who is again admonished to keep remembering and believing in the imminent threat of Islamic terrorism.<br />
<br />
Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab was supposedly on a terrorist "watch list"... the US government apparently saw no need to revoke his visa anyway because, they tell us, they were tracking his movement to learn more about him. Seems reasonable... unless you're one of over a million Americans who have been put on no flight lists because you're a veteran or a member of a militia or just caught disliking government policies a little too much. Then it might seem somewhat ludicrous that the government has no qualms about letting a foreign man fly on US planes who is deemed to be a known Islamic extremist.<br />
<br />
Then there's Kurt Haskell...the man who witnessed the entire embarkation of the Underwear Terrorist. His story completely disregarded by government and media alike, he witnessed the Nigerian being escorted by a well dressed, wealthy looking man who was clearly not an employee of the airline. Though appearing Indian, the man spoke English like any American and reasoned with the airline concerning the Nigerian's lack of a passport "we do this all the time".<br />
<br />
"The FBI visited my office on December 29, 2009, and showed me a series of approximately 10 photographs. None were of the SDM. I asked the FBI if they brought the Amsterdam security video to help me identify the SDM, but they acted as though my request was ridiculous. The FBI asked me what accent the SDM spoke in and I indicated that he had an American accent similar to my own. I further indicated that he wore a tan suit without a tie, was Indian looking, around age 50, 6'0" tall and 250-260 lbs. I further indicated that I did not believe that he was an airline employee and that he was not on our flight...<br />
<br />
"On January 20, 2010, current Director of the National Counterterrorism Center (NCTC), Michael E. Leiter, made a startling admission. Leiter indicated that: "I will tell you, that when people come to the country and they are on the watch list, it is because we have generally made the choice that we want them here in the country for some reason or another...<br />
<br />
"Could the SDM have been a U.S. Government official? He dressed in a suit and not a security uniform. Check. He indicated we do this all the time. Could "we" be the U.S. Government? Check. He spoke English with an American accent. Check. Would he need to convince the ticket agent that this was a normal procedure to allow boarding without a passport? Check. Would he have the ability to obtain such clearance? Check. Could he enter this security area even though he wasn't a passenger? Check. Would the ticket agent likely refer this request to a manager? Check. Would the U.S. Government not want this information public and try to hide it? Check."<br />
<br />
- Kurt Haskell<br />
<br />
<a href="http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com/2010/01/truth-about-flight-253-has-been.html">http://haskellfamily.blogspot.com/2010/01/truth-about-flight-253-has-been.html</a><br />
<br />
The incident hit the media outlets like alarm bells for the next 9-11. Ignoring every indication of a carefully engineered plan to just this end, the masses barely flinched when immediately airport security went from highly inconvenient to downright abusive overnight. Enter the backscatter x-ray full body scanner.<br />
<br />
If you were under the impression that the airport body scanner became a reality as a result of a sudden need for higher security, you'd be mistaken. These invasive little devices are the creation of a client company of one Michael Chertoff, former head of Homeland Security who took advantage of this very convenient underwear episode months after the company, Rapiscan, sold 25 million dollars of the technology to TSA. What a timely sale.<br />
<br />
If there is any right which sums up the most basic of freedoms, it has to the right to one's own body. Nothing is more personal, nothing else is more truly in any persons possession than their own flesh. It must certainly be a sort of canary in the coal mine where it comes to personal freedoms when the majority are willing to submit their right to their own body to strangers who claim an authority over it in the name of....defending the Land of the Free?<br />
<br />
When it is suddenly OK that airports demand to see a person nude in one of their ionizing backscatter scanners, does it ever occur to the populace that hypothetically being conquered by Islamo-fascists could be any worse? At least they tend to agree we should keep our clothes on. Hence i consider it the height of hypocrisy when someone declares of the present ongoing "war on terror" and the military involvement in it as "defending our freedoms". Stripping people (literally) of their humanity is a path to freedom in what reality?<br />
<br />
At the risk of sounding old fashioned... back in the day, when "men were men", it would be a cold day in a very hot place when anyone's wife or child or elderly mother would be allowed to be subjected to a strip search by people who's moral character was unknown at best and extremely questionable at worst. They, after all, are not criminals...they are average citizens simply trying to travel and they are subject to the sorts of abuses which literally are criminal in any other context. If the idea of a neighbor with high powered binoculars spying on one's wife or child while dressing is disturbing...this should be more so by virtue of the fact that it is condoned by those in "authority".<br />
<br />
All common decency and dignity aside...this device is an X-ray. It works by way of ionizing radiation, a serious cumulative health hazard in spite of the assurances of the FDA and government spokesmen. The FDA being the same organization who feels no need to warn people on food labels of eating genetically manipulated organisms, who approve thousands of brand name drugs that are later shown to cause numerous fatalities...these are the people the public trusts when it comes to irradiating their bodies at the airport.<br />
<br />
Ionizing radiation is known to cause chromosome damage. Even the supposedly innocuous "background" radiation which passes through Earth's atmosphere and reaches Earth is not so harmless... it too, eventually breaks the body down and causes aging.<br />
<br />
Most of the radiation from a backscatter scanner is concentrated on the surface of the skin and the fatty layer just below it... the potential risk for skin and breast cancer is especially concerning. The FDA claim that it would require some 5,000 scans per year to reach any level of threat, even if generally correct (and evidence would suggest it isn't) does not account for the 1 in 20 people who are genetically highly sensitive to radiation or the fact that children are all much more sensitive to radiation than adults as they are still growing.<br />
<br />
Ionizing radiation is comprised EM waves or subatomic particles that basically rip the electrons from the atoms and molecules in one's cells. If it sounds like bad news, that's because it is.<br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><img src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038477572?profile=original" alt=""/></p>
<br />
The risks, the "experts" say, are outweighed by the benefits. The benefits are that people are supposed to feel more secure. Secure from what, i wonder? Secure from the one terrorist who did not get the memo on the new technology? The next obvious step, if one buys into the terrorist threat line, is that they will inevitably begin stowing their explosive devices, etc. in body cavities. What then? Are you really ready for a full cavity search in order to board a plane? Are you living in a free country when survival at any cost is the new definition thereof? Is there anyone left who feels basic human rights are worth a little risk if there is some?<br />
<br />
Having rolled over like cowering puppies, the public has not purchased peace of mind, they've simply helped the government up the ante on paranoia. Compliance to body scanners has proven that Fear and Cowardice are the real slave masters of the masses and that they will bow before any oppressor who serve their tools, Tyranny and Corruption. They will allow their wives, their kids, their old mothers and fathers to be manhandled, insulted, poked, irradiated, stared at in the nude and reduced to tears.<br />
<br />
Don't be fooled by the assurances TSA has given that the images cannot be stored or transferred or that the images themselves are not well defined and photograph clear. TSA's own documents clearly specify that the machines must have both image storing and sending ability. The images the machines produce must be able to focus in on the most private details of the body in order to be able to identify any suspicious item attached to the body.<br />
<br />
There is technically an opt-out option for the scanners. This "opting out", however, simply puts one in a position to choose between a nude picture of themselves viewed by multiple strangers or an incredibly personal pat down which includes a startlingly thorough feel-up of one's most private areas. That's called "molestation" anywhere else on earth. The obvious intent of such a horribly intrusive pat down is to ensure that the body scanner remain the preferable option for most people. Most people would rather pose for an embarrassing picture than subject themselves to a legalized sexual assault.<br />
<br />
If you think we've reached the absolute limit in denying citizens a right to basic privacy, try to imagine a future when this is the norm in a wide variety of public places: court rooms, libraries, bus stations, schools, sporting events, etc. Now ask yourself if you think you have the courage to resist before that becomes a reality. Please, American citizens,...at least for the sake your kids and your elders, have the guts and the decency to refuse this perverse form of oppression.<br />
<br />
<b>"Defend the poor and fatherless. Do justice to the afflicted and needy.<br />
Deliver the poor and needy. Free them from the hand of the wicked." - Psalm 82:3,4</b> Keppe Theorytag:timenolonger.ning.com,2010-09-29:5124148:Topic:31522010-09-29T18:53:51.000ZDeborahhttps://timenolonger.ning.com/profile/Deborah
Is anyone here familiar with Dr. Norberto Keppe and the Keppe Motor? I have just been introduced to this information. My understanding is that his ideas represent the reuniting of science with theology.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://somebodyelseshead.blogspot.com/2010/07/marriage-of-theology-and-science.html" target="_blank">http://somebodyelseshead.blogspot.com/2010/07/marriage-of-theology-and-science.html</a>
Is anyone here familiar with Dr. Norberto Keppe and the Keppe Motor? I have just been introduced to this information. My understanding is that his ideas represent the reuniting of science with theology.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://somebodyelseshead.blogspot.com/2010/07/marriage-of-theology-and-science.html" target="_blank">http://somebodyelseshead.blogspot.com/2010/07/marriage-of-theology-and-science.html</a> Rumors of Cyber Warstag:timenolonger.ning.com,2010-09-28:5124148:Topic:31432010-09-28T22:50:05.000ZCypriumhttps://timenolonger.ning.com/profile/Cyprium
Rumors of Cyber Wars<br />
<br />
We've been aware for some time that there is a certain irritation that the controllers feel toward the onslaught of information freely passed around on the internet. A well educated populace, free to learn and share information is not easily kept within the confines of state approved societal structures. The internet, at some point, will come under direct assault by the state...and we've been hearing whispers of "cybersecurity" laws which will forever alter the freedom of…
Rumors of Cyber Wars<br />
<br />
We've been aware for some time that there is a certain irritation that the controllers feel toward the onslaught of information freely passed around on the internet. A well educated populace, free to learn and share information is not easily kept within the confines of state approved societal structures. The internet, at some point, will come under direct assault by the state...and we've been hearing whispers of "cybersecurity" laws which will forever alter the freedom of speech and information on the web as we've known it.<br />
<br />
Is Stuxnet the tool that's been built to usher in the new cyber-world order? If you haven't heard the name of the revolutionary malware worm until now...just pray it doesn't become a household name in the next few months. Stuxnet is a complex, Windows specific worm built to spy on and reprogram critical industrial computer systems. A first ever of it's type in that it has a PLC rootkit... it uses default passwords to control software.<br />
<br />
This worm, far from being the work of a supernerd in his mother's basement...it has been estimated to have taken at least 6 months of work by a team of highly trained professionals to achieve. It required those who built it to have a working understanding of industrial computer processes and it upgrades itself even after the initial command and control server is disabled.<br />
<br />
Stuxnet was first discovered in June by a security firm in Belarus...since then it has targeted Indonesia, India, Pakistan and most notably..Iran where it reportedly targeted their nuclear facility. Most recently it has hit in Beijing, China where it attempted to infiltrate China's key industries.<br />
<br />
The worm was constructed for espionage and sabotage..it was clearly designed and released by a government. The question as to who is responsible has been narrowed down to two obvious choices...Israel and the United States. It has been widely claimed that it was targeting Iran specifically and that it was meant to disable their nuclear program and yet many other countries have been infiltrated by it as well. Simply collateral damage?<br />
<br />
I don't believe so...i believe Stuxnet was created to run like a global cyber pandemic. A worm meant to hit at the most critical infrastructures of any or all nations....a very timely and convenient reason to play the "national security" card in dealing with an internet which has been, to the powers of governance, a thorn in their collective side. A perfect excuse to make it "necessary" for cybersecurity laws to be passed.<br />
<br />
When a so-called "terrorist threat" is announced it is the historical pattern that those who pay for the threat are not those faceless foreign agents which the government names as the perpetrators..but the citizens. It will be the citizens who take the brunt of the blow if important infrastructure comes crashing down..and it will be the citizens who pay for the remedy..both literally and otherwise.<br />
<br />
The big mouths on the internet are the problem as far as the controllers are concerned...but in reality they are also the solution to Their solution. It is with that in mind, that i run my big mouth about this issue...seeing it for what it could possibly become and hoping that enough voices have the volume, as they have in the past, to erode the confidence of those who want to silence them.<br />
<br />
No one in this nation is not able to see the value of being able to freely state their own opinion, pass some useful information along or have confidence in the right to their own privacy. To believe that those things are not being actively demolished ,one small increment at a time, is flatly the result of willful ignorance that could cost every person who values those things for themselves..all of that and more.<br />
<br />
We now have a "free country" with "free speech zones"...and requirements for permits in order to protest. Who can't see the irony there? Since freedom has already gone the way of the dodo on the street...the cyber frontier remains the only relatively free communication left. So far...<br />
<br />
For the third time, a cybersecurity exercise conducted by homeland security is now underway in this country, going by the title "Cyber Storm III". If this basically constitutes battle preparations for cyberwarfare..make no mistake, we are the enemy they mean to engage. Wal-Mart - "...where the magic is going to happen."tag:timenolonger.ning.com,2010-09-09:5124148:Topic:28652010-09-09T04:31:27.000ZDeborahhttps://timenolonger.ning.com/profile/Deborah
While catching up at a friend's <a href="http://nikiraapana.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">blog</a>, I came across her link to the WSJ story reporting that Wal-Mart is adding RFID chips to specific clothing items - jeans and underwear - "the first step in a system that advocates say better controls inventory".<br />
<br />
It may surprise you to know that, according to my son who works at Wal-Mart, bras are one of the most shoplifted items in the store. Who would have thought?<br />
<br />
"While the tags can be…
While catching up at a friend's <a href="http://nikiraapana.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">blog</a>, I came across her link to the WSJ story reporting that Wal-Mart is adding RFID chips to specific clothing items - jeans and underwear - "the first step in a system that advocates say better controls inventory".<br />
<br />
It may surprise you to know that, according to my son who works at Wal-Mart, bras are one of the most shoplifted items in the store. Who would have thought?<br />
<br />
"While the tags can be removed from clothing and packages, they can't be turned off, and they are trackable. Some privacy advocates hypothesize that unscrupulous marketers or criminals will be able to drive by consumers' homes and scan their garbage to discover what they have recently bought.<br />
<br />
They also worry that retailers will be able to scan customers who carry new types of personal "ID cards as they walk through a store, without their knowledge. Several states, including Washington and New York, have begun issuing enhanced driver's licenses that contain radio- frequency tags with unique ID numbers, to make border crossings easier for frequent travelers. Some privacy advocates contend that retailers could theoretically scan people with such licenses as they make purchases, combine the info with their credit card data, and then know the person's identity the next time they stepped into the store.<br />
<br />
""We are going to see contactless checkouts with mobile phones or kiosks, and we will see new ways to interact, such as being able to find out whether other sizes and colors are available while trying something on in a dressing room," said Bill Hardgrave, head of the RFID Research Center at the University of Arkansas, which is funded in part by Wal-Mart. "That is where the magic is going to happen. But that's all years away.""<br />
<br />
<a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704421304575383213061198090.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704421304575383213061198090.html?mod=WSJ_hpp_LEFTTopStories</a> Big Brother...Get Out of My Trashtag:timenolonger.ning.com,2010-08-23:5124148:Topic:26072010-08-23T21:47:18.000ZCypriumhttps://timenolonger.ning.com/profile/Cyprium
It appears that there is no level of absurdity too extreme for Big Brother and simultaneously, no level of absurdity which is too intolerable to the citizens of this country. Incrementally, the nit picking controllers continue to administer fatality to freedom by way of thousands paper cuts over decades of time. As no one wound hurts bad enough to galvanize the ever - more intoxicated masses to any sort of action, the process continues.<br />
<br />
The latest in ridiculous micro-management techniques…
It appears that there is no level of absurdity too extreme for Big Brother and simultaneously, no level of absurdity which is too intolerable to the citizens of this country. Incrementally, the nit picking controllers continue to administer fatality to freedom by way of thousands paper cuts over decades of time. As no one wound hurts bad enough to galvanize the ever - more intoxicated masses to any sort of action, the process continues.<br />
<br />
The latest in ridiculous micro-management techniques employed by the ruling class is trash monitoring. Unbelievable, really, that even the refuse one throws out can't be left alone by this intrusive parasite of a world system which is evolving (or de-evolving). In the name of (what else) saving the planet, US cities are adopting a trash monitoring program much like one which has been in place in the UK for the past few years. Some 2.8 million homes in Great Britain now have trash bins fitted with rfid chips which monitor the amount of trash being disposed of. Some areas are requiring residents to sort their trash by color on penalty of a $1,500 (US) fine.<br />
<br />
The US normally follows in Police State tactics one step behind the UK and so it is that now the nosey dumpster-diving mafia has arrived on American shores. Obama has dumped half a million dollars of stimulus funds into an endeavor to produce microchipped trash bins to ensure that US citizens in Dayton Ohio will be good little sheep and recycle. City and Country government supplied another $60,000 of their own. All residents of Dayton will get their microchipped trash bins and the program will be coming out of the tax payers' pockets to the tune of 1.6 million dollars over the next few years. Charlotte NC has also joined the Green Mania movement and the latest city on board is Cleveland Ohio, which perhaps has caught the worst end of the trash bin spy network in the US to date.<br />
<br />
In Cleveland the plan is to make you recycle..or else. The plan won't be fully operational until the beginning of next year, but when it is i can safely say that Cleveland has just added one more reason in a long list for residents to find somewhere else to live. The chip will let the city know how often any one household recycles. If a household has not recycled in some weeks, a trash supervisor will rummage through their trash and count the recyclable items which the offenders have instead (gasp) discarded. If the bins are found to contain 10% or more recyclable items....the household is Fined $100. The end goal is to incorporate all residents of Cleveland in this program over the course of a few years. Fines will also be leveled on people who simply put out too much trash..recyclable or not. Those fines run from $250 to $500. You can already be fined in Cleveland for putting your trash out too early or leaving the bins out too late. Who knew taking out the trash could be such a pain in the backside?<br />
<br />
If something simple and routine and fairly ignored as a matter of daily thought could be made into a giant irritation, you can be sure that the PTB will find a way to do it. Furthermore if they can manage to force you into a position to have every minute detail of your life examined under a microscope..well that's enough to make them giddy. They also realize that people generally don't like a regular pain in the backside which costs them money besides, and so they realize they need to provide you with some sort of incentive to just sit down and take it. That incentive, these days, comes as the rallying cry "save the planet..recycle!".<br />
<br />
Those who are hardcore environmentalists, and even those who are not are entirely convinced that good people recycle and bad, careless people throw things away. They are convinced that we will all find ourselves buried under mountains of trash someday in a landscape barren of trees (since we've used them all for paper) and choking to death for all the pollution and lack of oxygen...unless everyone recycles. The propaganda which demands either you accept giving up some of your natural freedoms or you will die a miserable death on a dying planet is a hit. The compliant masses are given an incentive to feel good about themselves for bowing down to strict regulation. They even acquire a sort of "martyrs complex" whereby they feel such a level of self righteousness that their venom toward non compliant people borders on a hostility one might reserve for serial killers.<br />
<br />
It is time to do a little homework on the claims environmentalism makes concerning the impact of the private sector on the planet's ecosystems. Environmentalism is a misnomer...instead of being a movement of the people to help clean up the natural environment, what it is precisely, is a political tool by which government manipulates the masses into accepting the chipping away of their human rights. If you would really believe that there is any attempt within government which remotely resembles cleaning up the planet, consider these things which are never mentioned as environmental concerns by government and mainstream media alike:<br />
<br />
GMO crops: an insanely destructive enterprise to the ecosystem, not only will genetically manipulated crops destroy Your health, but will contaminate and eventually destroy their natural counterparts, kill bee populations needed for pollination and pose a threat to any wildlife who eats them. These crops aren't just OK with government, they have gone to great lengths to ensure producers of them don't even have to tell you you're eating them. Ever hear mainstream media or DC griping at you to stop eating GMO produce?<br />
<br />
Suppression of free energy: you may believe it has simply been a matter of necessity that energy is produced in the manner it is by means of great amounts of money and fossil fuels, all neatly kept in control by a few companies around the country. Not true by a long shot...the means to produce energy which would be entirely clean and Cost Free to every person on the planet after an initial set up has existed since the early 1900's in the wake of technology brought to light by Nicola Tesla. Why don't we have it? well...ask the government who wants to microchip your trash bins..it beats me.<br />
<br />
Pharmaceutical Industry waste: Without even mentioning the process of making the pharmaceuticals themselves, let's just consider the ramifications of millions of people popping pills all over the country. Medication, which by the way has never cured anything but has made the drug companies very wealthy, is a serious pollutant in the water supply. These medications remain in the water supply even after treatment at water facilities and as a result they have devastating effects on the wildlife who comes in contact with the residual chemicals. Now we have populations of fish and amphibians who can't produce fertile males and shellfish who have no natural instinct to avoid predators. Since when has the government done anything to try to promote natural prevention and cure over pharmaceuticals?<br />
<br />
Water Treatment facilities: Across the nation, water treatment facilities maintain a practice of adding cocktails of chemicals to the drinking water of municipalities..some 400 different sorts of chemicals actually. Among these are sodium fluoride..a horrifically toxic chemical waste left over from manufacturing plants. These chemicals are unspeakably harmful to the human body, not to mention their impact on the environment. Sodium Fluoride is particularly hard to filter out of water once it is in it...even distillation will not remove the chemical. It is a government decision that city water supplies should be a toxic soup of waste chemicals. Feeling less motivated by Big Brother's insistence that you recycle yet?<br />
<br />
Recycling itself has no great benefit to the environment as the process itself is a producer of pollution. It does little to nothing to help keep trees alive since the paper industry is responsible for most of the trees planted anyway. At one time in the past there was a perfectly biodegradable, wholly renewable source for paper products which required much less processing than wood pulp and would have done away with the need to ever use wood for paper production altogether. That product was hemp... but the government on behalf of the companies who's interest was in wood pulp quickly found reasons to demonize the reputation of cannabis in the public mind so that a simple wild plant became utterly taboo and a cheap and plentiful resource was abandoned. The entire question of recycling to spare trees would be as easily resolved by substituting hemp for wood pulp now. This does not seem to be of any interest in DC either.<br />
<br />
Ever heard of straining gnats and swallowing camels? Obviously there is no point in mandating recycling to any end which benefits the environment while at the same time there is such a complete disinterest in government to address real issues of environmental concern. One might easily brush that off with flippant remarks of some general lack of intelligence on the part of politicians but that is not the root cause suggested by the ever increasing surveillance grid which has been gradually introduced to US citizens. One by one, an individual has to either keep coming up with excuses for measures like these or reasonably decide that they are all to some greater purpose. Answering the issue with "it's just a traffic camera...no big deal", "it's just a product rfid...no big deal", "it's just recycling..no big deal"...eventually ends at "it's just a national security implantable device...it's no big deal."<br />
<br />
At what point do people get sick of it? At what point is it too much invasion? At what point are people willing to say.."forget it, i'm not going to take it anymore."? I don't know what you're planning to do about it, residents of Cleveland Ohio, but i can tell you what i would do...i would outright refuse to comply..period. Perhaps i'd try disabling that nasty little chip with a neodymium magnet or maybe i'd simply think about hiring a private trash disposal company even if it cost more....possibly if all else failed i'd move. Come hell or high water though, $100 fines or $1,000 (which i would also flatly refuse to pay)..my answer would have to remain "No". I think it's past time for a little civil disobedience.<br />
<br />
Humanity is endowed with certain inalienable rights which are by nature the gift of their Creator, not a government privilege. Nanotechnology: Playing Creator and The Mark of the Beasttag:timenolonger.ning.com,2010-08-01:5124148:Topic:23402010-08-01T23:17:35.000ZProdigal Sonhttps://timenolonger.ning.com/profile/ProdigalSon
In the beginning YHWH created the Heavens and the Earth. Though some might doubt that this is true, it is hard to imagine how doubt could exist when it is possible to know that even the tiniest of molecular structures are held in such delicate and perfect construction. If any number of small differences occurred in the strength or weakness of the bonds which holds them together, the universe as it is known would be undone.<br />
<br />
As it is said "a fool says in his heart 'there is no Elohim'". It is…
In the beginning YHWH created the Heavens and the Earth. Though some might doubt that this is true, it is hard to imagine how doubt could exist when it is possible to know that even the tiniest of molecular structures are held in such delicate and perfect construction. If any number of small differences occurred in the strength or weakness of the bonds which holds them together, the universe as it is known would be undone.<br />
<br />
As it is said "a fool says in his heart 'there is no Elohim'". It is reserved for foolishness that not only would some deny Him but at the same time attempt to be Him. They are considered great minds of science and yet they are only fools who do not stop at interfering with the genetic material of living things, creating creatures who's existence in the world have consequences still unknown to them, they will continue to the very foundations of matter itself to also alter them.<br />
<br />
As those who began to build the tower of Babel, they seek to reach a goal which is by the nature of all things, forbidden to them and as YHWH said of those who built the tower "now nothing which they propose to do will be impossible for them." So the science of nanotechnology has been achieved, a corruption of the foundation of all creation and a little understood science to the public who is scarcely made aware of it.<br />
<br />
Nanotechnology is a science of manipulating matter at an atomic and molecular level, structures which do not exceed 100 nanometers in size, a nanometer being one billionth of a meter. This study is founded on an idea that it is possible to construct a small mechanism which in turn constructs a smaller one and so forth down to minute structures of nano size which are able to perform like machines.<br />
<br />
Molecules can be redesigned to have an affinity for a certain configuration based on their intermolecular forces which then lead to self assembly of a desired nanostructure. Redefining forces which naturally bind molecules in certain formations makes it possible then to build entirely new materials which have never before existed. DNA is a structure of particular interest to nanotechnology, using it as ideal material for building nanostructures. This use and manipulation of DNA is especially disturbing. Though it is not discussed as a goal of nanoscience, the ability to rewrite DNA in any way a scientist might choose is a possibility which exists. We can then imagine a time when DNA is rewritten to someone's precise desire and in this synthesized form, used to grow living organisms who's genetic material has been entirely chosen by the will of some man.<br />
<br />
A branch of nanoscience, called nanorobotics focuses on machines which are tiny, self sufficient robots. It is alarming that the hope for use of these devices is in the medical field. Injecting nanomachines into a human being supposedly to target cancer cells or identify diseases or otherwise treat them is the supposed goal. It is hard to imagine any person feeling safe undergoing such a procedure, yet there is enough evidence that people are willing to trust in anything a scientist is willing to tell them is safe.<br />
<br />
<p style="text-align: left;"><img src="http://storage.ning.com/topology/rest/1.0/file/get/3038477552?profile=original" alt=""/></p>
<br />
A serious problem with all nanoparticle structures is the unpredictable difference a nanostructure behaves as opposed to it's larger source matter. A certain substance which might be water soluble normally, becomes non water soluble as a nanoparticle, something which was once stable becomes unstable. The consequences of working with and integrating nanoparticles into living things, food supplies, cosmetics, packaging and polymers are at best unknown and at worst, known to be harmful and are used anyway. Many of these uses are already being practiced with no prior warning to the public what it is they are coming in contact with.<br />
<br />
Nanoparticles are able to bypass cell membranes and enter directly into the cells of living things causing biochemical damage and ultimately cancer. Carbon nanotubes which can occur naturally in volcanic eruptions have a sharp, needle-like structure, which like some forms of asbestos can cause tearing in lung cells when inhaled, resulting in mesothelioma.<br />
<br />
Pharmaceutical makers are interested in adding data storing nanochips to their medications. The data stores when and where the pills were made, where it has been since it was made, manufacturer information, expiration date, batch number and whatever else they might wish to add. The nanostructures are ingested with the medication and travel through the body, lodging themselves in tissue.It is possible to then read this information remotely.<br />
<br />
Those that are for such things argue that not only can it protect pharmaceutical patents but it can give medication information about an unconscious patient in an emergency. What it is also capable of doing is being a very useful tool in forcing people to be medicated who do not wish to be. It can affect insurance policies, employment opportunities and set up a possibility for a society in which mandatory vaccination can be easily achieved with this method of knowing who has received a medication and who has not. Beware of what is called nutraceuticals in vitamins if you hope to avoid ingesting nanotechnology. These are nanoparticles that are claimed to be safe additives to improve delivery of the vitamin.<br />
<br />
Perhaps the most disturbing of all discoveries in the science of nanotechnology is the potential use for controlling the thoughts and actions of others. It has been found that heating clusters of magnetic nanoparticles in targeted cells can allow the remote control of ion channels and neurons. By this means they have been able to literally dictate the movements of a controlled animal test subject.<br />
<br />
"By developing a method that allows us to use magnetic fields to stimulate cells both in vitro and in vivo, this research will help us unravel the signaling networks that control animal behavior,...We targeted the nanoparticles near what is the 'mouth' of the worms, called the amphid,You can see in the video that the worms are crawling around; once we turn on the magnetic field, which heats up the nanoparticles to 34 degrees Celsius, most of the worms reverse course. We could use this method to make them go back and forth. Now we need to find out which other behaviors can be controlled this way." " -Arnd Pralle, PhD, assistant professor of physics at the UB College of Arts and Sciences<br />
<br />
Many Christians are watching these days for signs of the tyrannical antichrist system and the mark which will come with it and many have guessed that it is likely that some sort of RFID device will be used to implant under the skin of the right hand or forehead. It would seem, though that science is perhaps beyond this and that if this mark might be implemented in the coming few years, nanotechnology might be the most obvious of likely choices.<br />
<br />
MIT, in fact , has already created a carbon nanotube tattoo that is for the purpose of monitoring blood glucose levels. The word which describes the mark in Revelation - charagma literally means a scratch, an etching or a stamp.